This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

#11722 - Duty Of Confidentiality - Ethics

Notice: PDF Preview
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Ethics Outlines. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting.
See Original

The lawyer was under an obligation to keep information relating to the representation confidential. That duty survives the termination of the attorney-client relationship. It does not matter how much time has passed.

The two different sources of law that describes the duty of confidentiality: civil procedure, ethical/ professional rules.

Encourage the clients to tell the truth.

Defensive doctrines - typically the lawyers do not want to disclose. Investigation concept.

Rule 26(b)(3): Ordinarily, a party may not discover documents and tangible things that are prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for another party or its representative. But, subject to Rule 26(b)(4), those materials may be discovered if: (i) they are otherwise discoverable under Rule 26(b)(1); and (ii) the party shows that it has substantial need for the materials to prepare its case and cannot, without undue hardship, obtain their substantial equivalent by other means. Court must protect mental impressions, conclusions, opinions or legal theories of a party attorney or other representative concerning the litigation.

Information is privileged if it is a (1) confidential (2) communication between a (3) attorney acting as an attorney of the client and (4) the client, (5) for the purpose of rendering legal advice, (6) that is not waived by disclosure to a third party. The privilege belongs to the client.

Lower level employees of a corporation are also considered clients. (Upjohn)

Prospective client: a lawyer who has discussions with a prospective client must keep confidential the information learned of in the consultation [MR 1.18]

Attorney-client privilege belongs to the client, and it continues after the client's death. There are only a few situations in which the attorney can decide to waive it without the client's permission, such as a situation in which it is necessary to prevent death or serious bodily harm to another [MR 1.6].

However, the MR only allows, but does not require, a lawyer to reveal information she believes necessary to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm.

Attorney blog, advertising issue and the A-C privilege issue

The privilege was trumped by the first amendment when the opinion is in public domain and when the case is concluded.

client is a university, athletic director and the president call you into the room: the athletic director has been bothered by an anonymous person: mass cheating by football players, five professors give them in advance the test questions before the exam. What should the lawyer do?

To do an Upjohn style series of interviews, to investigate the allegations, people know that everything they say will be confidential. Can athletic director ask the question? Yes, athletic director is an employee.

The other side deposes the coach, you defend the deposition:

Did you prepare the deposition? Yes

Did you prepare it with the lawyer? Yes

When? Where? Can answer these

Did the lawyer tell you what questions you can expect? - Objection, A-C privilege.

If the coach answers that question, he inadvertently waives the privilege.

The other side deposes the athletic director:

Did you conduct interviews? Yes

Take notes? Yes

Have the notes? Yes

Did you write a report based on those notes? Yes

Work product in anticipation of a lawsuit (from the other side or from professors’ lawyers), don’t have to turn over the notes.

Dual purposes that include anticipation of lawsuit is Okay.

In a car, on speaker, client call you: you say, I cannot talk to you now

In an office, client calls you from a car; there are other people in the car: tell the client that this is not privileged because there are third parties.

When individuals come to see a lawyer they come with spouse: could be waiving the privilege, ask the spouse to leave.

Lawyer sends client, others read the client’s email: typically it’s waived.

Reporter comes to you asking whether or not a report will put him in trouble, but you don’t know that this reporter is a spy working for a foreign government, and the source is working for the FBI: the client has the AC privilege, and can decide whether or not to waived it.

In a criminal defense, you failed, client in jail. Client hires another lawyer, suing you for ineffective counsel, in order to get out of jail. The client called you, you tell the client that you are no longer a lawyer, no privilege any more. Prosecutor calls you and wants the conversation. Is it privileged? Maybe, because of the prior relationship, the client may still think that there is an ongoing relationship.

Note 3 p178: the attorney-client privilege survives the death of the client. Because clients may be concerned about reputation, civil liability, or possible harm to friends or family posthumously.

If the other side inadvertently sends you something, you have the obligation to make judgments about whether this is sent inadvertently. You should inform the opposing counsel (MR 4.4(b)). Can isolate the lawyer from the case and ask other lawyers at the firm to represent the client.

Plaintiff, David Spaulding, was a victim in a serious car accident. Insurance companies for both sides...

Unlock the full document,
purchase it now!
Ethics
Target a first in law with Oxbridge