This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Law Outlines Evidence Outlines

Evidence Chapter 11 Physical Evidence Outline

Updated Evidence Chapter 11 Physical Evidence Notes

Evidence Outlines

Evidence

Approximately 796 pages

Hello! These are my notes and outlines for Evidence, based on the textbook by Sklansky, Evidence: Cases, Commentary and Problems (4th ed.).

The full course outline includes detailed case briefs, along with class discussions. You could use it to excel in cold-calls even if you haven't done the readings.

The exam outline has been pared down. It will be good for persons looking to learn the main points of material before their exam, without worrying about the detailed factual and procedural ...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Evidence Outlines. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Table of Contents

Chapter 11. Physical Evidence 1

A. Authentication 1

B. The Best Evidence Rule 7

1. Scope and Purpose 8

2. Exceptions 9

*NB: This outline accords with Sklansky, Evidence: Cases, Commentary and Problems 4th ed.

Chapter 11. Physical Evidence

Introduction

  • Physical evidence is subject to many of the same rules as testimony: documents inadmissible if they contain hearsay; guns inadmissible if they serve only to demonstrate defendant’s violent character. But also two other rules: authentication and best evidence.

    • All physical evidence must be authenticated: party offering evidence must provide sufficient evidence to allow the factfinder to conclude the evidence is genuine.

      • This is form of conditional relevance,

    • Certain physical evidence and certain forms of testimony may be rendered inadmissible by the best evidence rule.

      • This rule has a narrow scope. It requires only that a party seeking to prove the content of a document introduce the original—and even that requirement has significant exceptions.

      • If the content of the document is in the factfinder’s chain of inferences (not at the beginning or end of chain), then the BER applies.

  • “Real evidence”: items that allegedly played some role in or were generated by the events in dispute.

  • “Demonstrative evidence”: items generated by lawyers (charts, diagrams, photographs) to clarify their point or make it more vivid.

    • Demonstrative evidence is not subject to requirement of authentication of BER.

  • Difference between introducing an exhibit and merely marking it: exhibits must be marked for identification even if they are never introduced into evidence but, for example, are only used for refreshing recollection of forgetful witness.

    • Exhibit merely marked but not introduced cannot be relied upon by jury.

A. Authentication

FRE 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence

  • (a) In General. To satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence, the proponent must produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is.

  • (b) Examples. The following are examples only--not a complete list--of evidence that satisfies the requirement:

    • (1) Testimony of a Witness with Knowledge. Testimony that an item is what it is claimed to be.

    • (2) Nonexpert Opinion About Handwriting. A nonexpert's opinion that handwriting is genuine, based on a familiarity with it that was not acquired for the current litigation.

    • (3) Comparison by an Expert Witness or the Trier of Fact. A comparison with an authenticated specimen by an expert witness or the trier of fact.

    • (4) Distinctive Characteristics and the Like. The appearance, contents, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive characteristics of the item, taken together with all the circumstances.

    • (5) Opinion About a Voice. An opinion identifying a person's voice--whether heard firsthand or through mechanical or electronic transmission or recording--based on hearing the voice at any time under circumstances that connect it with the alleged speaker.

    • (6) Evidence About a Telephone Conversation. For a telephone conversation, evidence that a call was made to the number assigned at the time to:

      • (A) a particular person, if circumstances, including self-identification, show that the person answering was the one called; or

      • (B) a particular business, if the call was made to a business and the call related to business reasonably transacted over the telephone.

    • (7) Evidence About Public Records. Evidence that:

      • (A) a document was recorded or filed in a public office as authorized by law; or

      • (B) a purported public record or statement is from the office where items of this kind are kept.

    • (8) Evidence About Ancient Documents or Data Compilations. For a document or data compilation, evidence that it:

      • (A) is in a condition that creates no suspicion about its authenticity;

      • (B) was in a place where, if authentic, it would likely be; and

      • (C) is at least 20 years old when offered.

    • (9) Evidence About a Process or System. Evidence describing a process or system and showing that it produces an accurate result.

    • (10) Methods Provided by a Statute or Rule. Any method of authentication or identification allowed by a federal statute or a rule prescribed by the Supreme Court.

FRE 902. Evidence That Is Self-Authenticating

  • The following items of evidence are self-authenticating; they require no extrinsic evidence of authenticity in order to be admitted:

    • (1) Domestic Public Documents That Are Sealed and Signed. A document that bears:

      • (A) a seal purporting to be that of the United States; any state, district, commonwealth, territory, or insular possession of the United States; the former Panama Canal Zone; the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; a political subdivision of any of these entities; or a department, agency, or officer of any entity named above; and

      • (B) a signature purporting to be an execution or attestation.

    • (2) Domestic Public Documents That Are Not Sealed but Are Signed and Certified. A document that bears no seal if:

      • (A) it bears the signature of an officer or employee of an entity named in Rule 902(1)(A); and

      • (B) another public officer who has a seal and official duties within that same entity certifies under seal--or its equivalent--that the signer has the official capacity and that the signature is genuine.

    • (3) Foreign Public Documents. A document that purports to be signed or attested by a person who is authorized by a foreign country's law to do so. The document must be accompanied by a final certification that certifies the genuineness of the signature and official position of the signer or attester--or of any foreign official whose certificate of genuineness relates to the signature or attestation or is in a chain of certificates of genuineness relating to the signature or attestation. The certification may be made by a secretary of a United States embassy or legation; by a consul general, vice consul,...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Evidence Outlines.