ARTICLE X: CONTENTS OF WRITINGS, RECORDINGS, AND PHOTOGRAPHS:
FRE 1001: Definitions:
FRE 1001(1): Writings and recordings: consist of letters, words, or numbers, of their equivalent, set down by handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, magnetic impulse, mechanical or electronic recording, or other forms of data compilation
FRE 1001(2): Photographs: include still photographs, x-ray films, video tapes, and motion pictures
FRE 1001(3): Original: An “original” of a writing or recording is the writing or recording itself or any counterpart intended to have the same effect by a person executing or issuing it.
An “original” of a photograph includes the negative and any print therefrom
If data are stored on a computer or similar device, any printout or other output readable by sight, shown to reflect the data accurately, is an “original”
FRE 1001(4): Duplicate: A “duplicate” is a counterpart produced by: the same impression as the original, or from the same matrix, or by means of photography, including enlargements and miniatures, or by mechanical or electronic re-recording, or by chemical reproduction, or by other equivalent techniques which accurately reproduces the original.
FRE 1002: Requirement of Original (Best Evidence Rule): To prove the content of a writing, recording, or photograph, the original writing, recording, or photograph is required
Except as otherwise provided by FRE or statute
United States v. Duffy: Shirt with laundry mark “DUF” was found in D’s car. Shirt is both a chattel and a writing, thus could be treated as either. Words merge with object.
Here, because writing was simple, little danger that witness would inaccurately remember its terms
Terms of writing not central or critical to case against Duffy; shirt was one piece of evidence in a substantial case against Duffy
Meyers v. United States: In a trial for perjury, it was acceptable to call counsel at original hearing to testify as to what D said. Transcript of hearing not required.
Counsel’s testimony about what he heard was not an attempt to prove what a writing—the transcript—said.
Counsel’s testimony was equally competent as transcript to prove what D said at proceeding
FRE 1003: Admissibility of Duplicates: A duplicate is admissible to the same extent as an original unless:
FRE 1003(1): a genuine question is raised as to the authenticity of the original OR
FRE 1003(2): in the circumstances it would be unfair to admit the duplicate in lieu of the original
Turnage v. State: It was acceptable to admit copies of tapes of phone calls D made at county workhouse.
Although witness did not compare digital copies to analog originals, there is no genuine question of authenticity of the copies
Seven foundational elements that must be established before a tape recording can be admitted (as a supplement to FRE 1003):
Showing that the recording device was capable of taking testimony
Showing that the operator of the device was competent
Establishment of the authenticity and correctness of the recording
Showing that changes, additions, and deletions have not been made
Showing of the manner of the preservation of the recording
Identification of the speakers
Showing that the testimony elicited was voluntarily made without any kind of inducement
FRE 1004: Admissibility of Other Evidence of Contents: The original is not required, and other evidence of the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph is admissible if:
(1) Originals lost or destroyed: Unless the proponent lost or destroyed them in bad faith
(2) Original not obtainable: by any available judicial process or procedure
(3) Original in possession of opponent: At time when original was under control of party against whom offered, party was put on notice that contents would be a subject of proof at hearing and party does not produce original at hearing
(4) Collateral matters: Writing, recording, or photograph is not closely related to a controlling issue
FRE 1005: Public records: Contents of official record, or of document authorized to be recorded or filed and actually recorded or...