Actions Binding The Corporations Outline

Actions Binding the Corporations

1. Delegation of Board Authority to Corporate Executives

   1. All power exercised by a corporation's officers derive from the statutory power assigned to the board of directors.

   2. An agency is a consensual relationship between two parties, the principal and the agent.

   3. The principal selects the agent, who then must agree to act on the principal's behalf.

   4. The principal has the power to terminate the agency relationship unilaterally and can dictate to the agent how the agent will perform his duties

   5. The agent is a fiduciary of the principal, which means that the agent owes the principal duties of care, loyalty and obedience.

      1. The agent must always put the interests of the principal above his own.

      2. The agent has "a duty to obey all reasonable directions" of the principal given within the scope of the agent's services.

   6. An agent has the legal power to bind the principal in legal relationships with third parties (4 ways):

      1. (1) Actual Authority: the agent's power to affect the legal relations of the principal when the principal manifests consent.

         • Express: explicit words or conduct granting the agent power to bind the principal OR

         • Implied: from words or conduct taken in the context of the relations between the principal and the agent

           • Whether express or implied, authority is created by "written or spoken words or other conduct of the principal which, reasonably interpreted, causes the agent to believe the that the principal desires him so to act on the principal's account." Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc. - pg. 309

      2. (2) Apparent Authority

         • Authority is created by written or spoken words or any other conduct that, reasonably interpreted, causes a third person to believe that the principal consents to have the act done on his behalf by the agent

           • "What matters is whether third parties . . . reasonably relied on representations made to the general public." Summit Prop., Inc. v. New Tech. Elec. Contractors, Inc. - pg. 306

      3. (3) Inherent Agency Power

         • Looks to how the principal ordinarily would conduct his business

           • "[T]he inherent agency theory 'originates from the customary authority of a person in the particular type of agency relationship . . . .'" Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc. - pg. 310

           • Inherent agency power is "the power of an agent which is derived . . . solely from the agency relation and exists for the protection of persons harmed by or dealing with a servant or other agent." Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc. - pg. 309

           • "[A]n agent's inherent authority subjects his principal to liability for acts done on his account which [(1)] usually accompany or are incidental to transactions which the agent is authorized to conduct if, although they are forbidden by the principal, [(2)] the other party reasonably believes that the agent is authorized to do them and [(3)] has no notice that he is not so authorized." Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc. - pg. 309-10 (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency § 161)

      4. (4) Ratification

         • A principal can become obligated to a third party by later ratifying the act of another who, at the time of the act, lacked the power to bind the principal

           • Ratification relates back so it is as though the principal had conferred the authority before the act

           • Ratification can be shown by a party accepting the benefits of a contract. See Summit Prop., Inc. v. New Tech. Elec. Contractors, Inc. - pg. 306

   7. The CEO, whether known as the President or some other title, has the authority to bind the corporation in transactions entered into in the ordinary course of business

      1. "[T]he president [or CEO] only has the authority to bind his company by acts arising in the usual and regular course of business but not for contracts of an 'extraordinary' nature" Lee v. Jenkins Bros. - pg. 301

   8. The authority of subordinate officers depends on how a board has delegated responsibility within the corporation's management structure.

      1. A third party generally bears the burden of demonstrating that an act was within the officer's authority.

   9. Courts require that a third party who knows that a given transaction will benefit some officer to inquire further whether that officer has the valid authority to enter into the transaction. See, e.g., Branding Iron Motel Inc. v. Sandlian Equity, Inc.; Schmidt v. Farm Credit Services - pg. 302

   10. Estoppel: Where the authority is unclear, in the absence of repudiation by the corporation, the actions may nonetheless bind the corporation. See, e.g., Scientific Holding Co., Ltd. v. Plessey Inc. - pg. 302

   11. "'[I]f one of two innocent parties must suffer due to a betrayal of trust - either principal or third party - the loss should fall on the party most at fault. Because the principal puts the agent in a position of trust, the principal should bear the loss'" Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc. - pg. 310 (quoting Koval)

   12. Evidence that an officer has been delegated authority: (1) a provision of statutory law, (2) the articles of incorporation, (3) a bylaw of the company, (4) a resolution of the board of directors, or (5) evidence that the corporation had allowed the officer to act in similar matters and has recognized, approved or ratified these actions.

2. Formalities of Board Action

   1. Board Action at a Meeting

      1. THE MEETING RULE: To pass a resolution, both (1) a quorum and (2) an affirmative vote of the majority of the directors at a board meeting is required to pass a resolution. MBCA § 8.24(c).

         • BUT the articles or the by-laws can provide that a greater number of directors is required to pass a resolution. MBCA § 8.24(c).

         • STATUTORY EXCEPTIONS to the meeting rule

           • MBCA § 8.20(b) permits the board to conduct a meeting by "any means of communication by which all directors participating may simultaneously hear each other during the meeting."

           • MBCA § 8.21 allows board action to be taken without a meeting upon unanimous written consent of the directors

         • COMMON LAW EXCEPTIONS (possibly preempted by statutes)

           • Unanimous Director...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Corporations Outlines.