Bar Exam.MBE.Criminal Procedure
SEARCH & SEIZURE
Overview
Fourth Amendment prohibits state actors from engaging in unreasonable search or seizure
Search or seizure is reasonable only if authorized by
Warrant
Or
Warrant exemption/exceptions
AND
Executed in a reasonable manner
Evidence obtained pursuant to an unreasonable search or seizure MAY be excluded/suppressed
Thumbnail analysis
State Action?
Search (REP; physical intrusion) or Seizure (possessory interest; free to leave)?
Warrant (PC, particularity) or Warrant Exception?
Execution (reasonable; knock & announce)?
Suppression?
State Action
Rule:
4A only applies to State actors & agents
If police ask someone else to do it for them= State Action
Police on or off duty= state action
Search or Seizure
"Search"
Invasion of
REP=
Likely No REP if information
Exposed to Public
Transferred to third party who turns over to police
Into constitutionally protected area to obtain information
Protected areas:
Persons, houses, papers, and effect"
Examples
No REP: trash bags at curb, public location of car by visual surveillance, email to friend turned over by friend, financial records turned over to banker, pot in fenced yard seen from plane, drug dog sniff
Yes REP: email to friend that’s wiretapped, public location of car attached by gps, trash bags in fenced backyard curtilage
"Seizure"
Things
Test:
meaningful interference w/ a possessory interest
Ex. Detention, dispossession, destruction
Persons
Test:
exercise of authority which restrains freedom of movement, under which a reasonable person would not feel free to leave
Ex. Terry stops, arrests
"Standing"
Test:
Search or seizure may be challenged only by the person who was searched or seized
Ex.
Driver challenges stop of car: Yes
Passenger challenges STOP of car: Yes
Driver or owner challenges SEARCH of car: Yes
Passenger challenges car SEARCH: NO
Driver challenges SEARCH of Passenger Purse: No
Passenger challenges SEARCH of OWN PURSE: Yes
Overnight guest challenges SEARCH of GUEST AREA: Yes
Afternoon guest challenges SEARCH of guest area: NO
Warrant or Warrant Exception
Overview:
A search or seizure must be authorized by
Valid warrant
Or
A warrant exception
Warrant Requirements
Probable cause
Particularity
Oath or Affirmation, and
Detached & Neutral Magistrate
Warrant Exceptions
Plain view
Consent
Exigent circumstances
Automobile
Public arrests
Search incident to lawful arrest
Inventory
Terry
Special needs
Stackability
May stack warrant & warrant exceptions on top of each other to expand authority
Scope
May not exceed the scope of authority under warrant or warrant exceptions
Warrant
Requirements
Probable Cause (PC)
Test: Fair probability, reasonable grounds, or reasonable trustworthy info sufficient for prudent person to conclude:
Crime has been or is being committed by the person to be seized, or
Evidence of criminality is in the place to be searched
Note: Hearsay and anonymous tips MAY support (though not necessarily establish) PC
Particularity
Test: sufficiently definite for police to identify persons, places, or items to be searched or seized w/ reasonable certainty
Note:
Name or addresses are sufficient but not necessary
Particularity must be ON THE FACE of warrant or through an INCORPORATED affidavit
Oath or Affirmation
Test: Police must give information supporting warrant UNDER OATH
Detached and Neutral Magistrate
Test: NO STAKE in outcome, not be a RUBBER STAMP
Note: not need be judge or lawyer
Warrant Exceptions
Plain View
Test: Police may search or seize an item they see in "plain view" IF
See the evidence
AND
PC item is connected w/ criminality
Note:
Authority may derive from warrant, warrant exception, or public location of vantage point
Plaint Feel: police may also search or seize an item they feel during an authorized search of person (Terry Frisk) IF feel gives rise to PC
Tip:
What they see in "plain view" must be located somewhere where what they have authority to search for could be found
Ie.
search warrant for tv, cant use to find "drugs" in drawer cause Tv cant fit in drawer
Search warrant for tv, can use if find "drugs" in closet cause tv can fit in closet
Consent
First-Party Consent
Voluntary under totality of circumstances
Factors: police actions & suspect's background
Note: ignorance of right to refuse not fatal
Third-Party Consent
Voluntariness, AND
Actual authority to consent based on joint access & control
Or
Police have Reasonable belief in apparent authority to consent
Objecting Co-Occupants:
Police may NOT search home over PRESENT objection of co-occupant
Exigent Circumstances
Test
Reasonable basis for police to believe delay in obtaining warrant would result in
Evidence destruction
Danger to Public or Police, OR
Flight of Suspect
Note
Still need PC of criminality
Lesser the crime (misdemeanor) and the greater the intrusion (home), less likley for courts to find exigency
Ex.
Police pursue into home suspect whom they have PC committed felony: VALID
Police search home for suspect of fine-only traffic offense: INVALID
Automobile
Test
Probable cause that any area of car to be searched (including containers) harbors evidence of criminality)
Ex.
Police search trunk based on PC car contains stolen TV: Valid
Police search glove box based on PC car contains stolen TV: Invalid
Public Arrests
No Warrants required for arrests in public
Felonies: in Public and PC
Misdemeanors: Public, PC, and Committed in presence of Officer
Warrants required for arrests in private unless exception applies (exigent circumstances)
Arrestee's home: arrest warrant
Third-Party home: search warrant and an arrest warrant gives PC
Search Incident to Lawful Arrest (SILA)
Person:
Contemporaneous search of
Suspect of person
Lunge area, and
Containers therein for weapons or evidence
Cars:
NO search unless
Reasonable belief that arrested occupants or recent occupant may access car (not secured in squad car)
Or
Reasonable belief car contains evidence of crime of arrest (not speeding)
Homes:
During time it takes to complete arrest, may conduct visual sweep (cursory visual inspection) for accomplices in
Adjoining rooms automatically, and
Other rooms if reasonable suspicion of danger
Inventory
Test
Within scope of reasonable and routine practice to protect valuables, police, and public, police may inventory contents or
Possessions of arrestee at booking after lawful arrest, AND
May search auto after lawful impoundment
Terry
Terry Stop
Required:
Reasonable suspicion that suspect is engaged in criminal activity
Allowed:
Brief detention & questioning to confirm or dispel suspicion
Reasonable Suspicion (RS)
must be based on specific articulable facts
RS is less than PC, but more than hunch
Terry Frisk
Required:
Lawful Terry Stop plus RS that suspect is armed & dangerous
Allowed:
"Patdown" of the outer clothing and lunge area for weapons
May not frisk for evidence (ie drugs)
May manipulate Ambiguous object to determine if weapon
May reach in and seize object if frisk confirms suspicion of WEAPON or gives rise to PC of CONTRABAND
Special Needs
Balancing Test:
If primary purpose is NOT related to crime investigation, may search or seize if government interest outweighs privacy intrusion
Common Purpose
Public health & safety
Tip
More random/regulated and dispersed the program, the more likely its reasonable
Ex
Drug testing student athlete suspected of illegal use: Not Valid
Get a warrant
Random drug testing of students in extracurriculars: Valid
Drug & alcohol tests of railroad workers post accident: Valid
Traffic Checkpoints to protect from drunk drivers: Valid
Traffic checkpoints to catch drug traffickers: INVALID
Customs checkpoint to stop importation of contraband: Valid
But at border or close to
Execution
Test:
Search or seizure must be executed REASONABLY
Before:
Must KNOCK & ANNOUNCE presence and purpose before entering premises ((under warrant or exception) UNLESS
Reasonable ground to believe
Dangerous (shotgun)
Futile (music to loud), OR
Destruction of Evidence
During:
May take REASONABLE STEPS to secure premises during authorized search or seizure, including
Temporarily detaining individual at scene,
Ordering occupants out of car
Suppression
Exclusionary Rule
Evidence obtained as a result of unconstitutional conduct is inadmissible against individual whose rights were violated as the FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE
Exceptions:
Procedural
Impeachment (cross-exam)
Grand Jury Proceeding
Parole Revocation Proceedings/hearings
Civil Proceedings
Doctrinal
Knock & Announce violation
EXCEPT IN OK, still suppressed
Reasonable & Good faith reliance on facially valid warrant (later found lacking...