BLACKMAIL
Common Law - look at statute (no usual MR, if no MR, read it in)
3 questions when analyzing a statute:
(1) what threats are covered (accuse of crime, reveal secret, commit violence)
(2) to obtain what (property/something of value/act against another's will)
(3) is there a claim-of-right defense (defense saying that the thing to be obtained is rightfully owned) (in statute or interpreted by courts)
MPC 223.4 approach
7 threats
(1) inflict injury/other crim offense - "inflict bodily injury on anyone or commit any other criminal offense"
(2) accuse of crime - "accuse anyone of a criminal offense"
(3) expose secret - "expose any secret tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or to impair his credit or business repute"
(4) take/withhold action as official - "take or withhold action as an official, or cause an official to take or withhold action"
(5) start/continue strike - "bring about/continue a strike if the property is not demanded/received for the benefit of the group"
(6) testify/withold testimony - "testify or withhold testimony with respect to another’s case"
(7) catch-all/harm not beneficial - "inflict any other harm which would not benefit the actor"
Note: should interpret benefit narrowly to exclude psychic/cathartic benefit
Obtain property only
Affirmative claim-of-right defense for threats 2,3,4 (accuse crime, expose secret, take act as an official)
Property obtained by threat is honestly (subjective) claimed as restitution or indemnification for harm done
Two examples of statutes
Example of statute - VT statute
(1) Maliciously (2) Threaten to accuse of crime or offense OR cause injury to person or property (3) with intent to extort property or act against the will
No claim-of-right defense
Harrington: attorney "maliciously" arranged for woman to sleep with client's husband, wrote letter threatening to accuse him of adultery (and possibly cause injury to his person due to reputational harm) in order to extort money in the form of settlement in the divorce action
Because no claim-of-right defense, cannot entertain argument that he was merely trying to get what his client rightfully deserved
Convicted of blackmail
Example of statute - NY/no claim of right defense
Fichtner: even though store managers were trying to get man to pay the value of what was thought to be stolen, no defense and convicted
POLICY:Why punish?
Wrongful to make someone do or give up something against their will > reduces human autonomy
Lack of closure and creates relationship of dominance-subordination
Deter people from digging up dirt on others to use to their advantage (unless whistleblower or consumer information > information beneficial to the public interest)
Incentivize reporting of blackmail and crimes (instead of profiting off them)
Prevent vigilante justice that usurps government power to punish/stop harm and that plays with the public interest (profiting from something against society's...
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.