This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

#17106 - Proportionality - Criminal Law

Notice: PDF Preview
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Criminal Law Outlines. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting.
See Original

PROPORTIONALITY

8th amendment requires proportionality (majority view)

  • Scalia/alito/thomas disagrees: 8A prohibits types of punishments, but no length of prison is too long

Individual challenge test (Ewing)

  1. Compare crime and the sentence and must find gross disproportionality

  2. See if there is a rational basis for believing sentence serves one of the four purposes of punishment, if so, not grossly disproportionate

  3. Compare sentence with sentence of other crimes in the same jx, or sentence or same crimes in diff jx

  • Difficult to satisfy:

    • Prosecutor can easily come up with a purpose in step two

Categorical challenge test (Graham)

  1. Look at objective indicia of society's standards

    1. Legislation

    2. Actual sentences

  1. Look at standards of precedents and court's understanding/interpretation of 8A

    1. Culpability of the offender class (juveniles)

    2. Seriousness of the offense (nonhomicide)

    3. Nature of punishment (LWOP)

    4. Whether punishment serves penological goals

    • Some also look to what other countries do

  • This test has been used to eliminate categories -

    • Sentencing juvenile to LWOP for nonhomicide

      • Juveniles have lessened culpability

      • Courts cannot distinguish incorrigible juvenile offenders with those capable of change

      • Incentivizes juveniles to demonstrate maturity and reform

    • Sentencing juveniles to mandatory LWOP for homicides

Summary: 8A prohibits grossly disproportionate sentences compared to crime

Individual challenge – Ewing Categorical challenge – Graham

Challenging terms of year sentence in individual case

  1. Compare crime and sentence and must see grossly disproportionality

  2. See if there is a reasonable basis for believing sentences serves one purpose of punishment (if yes, not grossly disproportional, if no, cont.)

  3. Ask how sentences compare with sentences of other crimes in the same jx, or sentences of same crime in other jx

Is imposing this punishment on a certain category unconst. dispropot?

  1. Look at objective indicia of societal standards

  • Legislation (intra and inter jx comparison)

  • Actual sentences

  1. Look at standards in precedents and court’s understanding/interpretation of 8A

  • Culpability of offender class (juveniles)

  • Nature of punishment (LWOP)

  • Seriousness of offense (non homicides)

  • Whether punishment serves penological goals

  • How other countries treat this offense

Cannot sentence juveniles to LWOP for non-homicides (Graham)

Cannot sentence juveniles to mandatory LWOP for homicide (2012)

Unlock the full document,
purchase it now!
Criminal Law
Target a first in law with Oxbridge