Intentional Killings: The MPC Framework
Intentional killing
CL: murder mitigated through adequate prov to vol manslaughter
MPC: murder mitigated through EMED to vol manslaughter
MPC
Murder 210.2(1)(a) - committed purposely or knowingly
UNLESS mitigate to voluntary manslaughter 210.3(1)(b)
EED
reasonable explanation or excuse of EED (see below)
MITIGATION TO VOL MANSLAUGHTER - EMED
210. 3(b) Intentional killing is manslaughter if
(1) committed under influence of extreme emotional or mental disturbance (EMED) - subjective
(2) there was a reasonable explanation or excuse for the EMED, reasonableness determined from the viewpoint of a person in a defendant's situation under the circumstances as defendant believed them to be - objective-subjective
** does not require provocation or cooling off time
Ex. Casassa
There was EED (shown by erratic behavior)
No reasonable excuse because given the short, casual relationship, the defendant's excuse of psychological abandonment issues are so peculiar to him that it is not an understandable human response
PROBLEM: What is reasonable person and what traits of the defendant does the reasonable person incorporate?
Same as above, courts debate based on utilitarian and retributive arguments (See discussion of reasonableness in Maher)
Summary
Intentional Killing Murder MR: purposely or knowingly Voluntary Manslaughter Mitigated from murder if (1) under extreme mental or emotional disturbance (EMED) (Casassa) – subj. (2) reasonable explanation or excuse of EMED – reasonable measured from POV of person in the situation of the D under circ. believed by D (Cassasa – distress caused by obsession, too peculiar to D) [argue what reasonable person incorporates] ... |
---|